Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cineflex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Cineflex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cineflex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

product advertisement for a non-notable product. I see passing mentions but no in-depth coverage. I am not sure how what is basically an electronic tripod is going to ever get in-depth coverage. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect to Gyro-stabilized_camera_systems#Manufacturers, where it is mentioned. I was expecting to find more reviews than I did and most I did find were not RS. Basic facts like it exists and is a gyro-stabilized camera system are verifiable. But it is not close to enough for notability for a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I think this is a resonable search term and a redirect to the broader article where it is mentioned seems reasonable and of due weight. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC) Update: It looks like the target article was deleted as a copyvio, so redirect to that is out. Delete, I guess. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 16:38, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. blatant spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - The article seems like advertising for a product, not a proper encyclopedic article. I could not find reliable sources that substantiate notability. Netherzone (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete — Not notable. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. Qono (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.